HOW MUCH USERS CONSIDER INFORMATION FROM SOCIAL MEDIA RELIABLE A STUDY REGARDING FACEBOOK TWITTER AND WHATSAPP

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/gmcr.2019(IV-I).05      10.31703/gmcr.2019(IV-I).05      Published : Dec 2019
Authored by : Muhammad Shahid , Kainat Ali , Musa Kamal

05 Pages : 52-74

References

  • Berlo, D. K. Lemert, J. B., & Mertz, R. J. (1969). Dimension for evaluating the acceptability of message sources. Public Opinion Quarterly, 46, 563-76.
  • Blumler, J. G., & Katz, E. (1974). The Uses of Mass Communications: Current Perspectives on Gratifications Research. Sage Annual Reviews of Communication Research Volume III.
  • Blumler, J. G., & McQuail, D. (1969). Television in politics: Its uses and influence. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Fogg, B. J. (2003). Prominence-interpretation theory: Explaining how people assess credibility online.
  • Hachten, W. A. (1998). The troubles of journalism. New Jersey: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates Inc.
  • Hartley, J. (1982). Understanding news. New York: Routledge.
  • Katz, E., Blumler, J. G., & Gurevitch, M. (1973). Uses and gratifications research. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 37(4), 509-523.
  • Mc Crosky, J.C. (1998). An introduction to communication in the classroom (2nd ed), MA; Tapestry Press.
  • Mclntyre, D. A. (2012). America's 10 largest websites.Sept. 10, 2012 http:/bottomline.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/03/25/10760486-americas-10-largest- websites.
  • McQuail, d. (2005). Mass communication theory. Oxford: The Alden Press
  • Metzgar, E., & Maruggi, A. (2010). Social media and the 2008 presidential election. Journal of new Communication Research
  • Metzger, M. J. Flanagin, A., Eyal, K., Lemus D. R., & McCann, R. M. (2003) Credibility for 21st. CHI'03 Extended abstracts on human factors in computing system, 722-723
  • Nielsen. (2009). Global Faces Networked Places. Nielsen online: The Nielsen Company.
  • Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuation. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 123-205.
  • Tankard, J., Hendrickson,L., Silberman,J., Bliss, K., & Ghanem, S.(1991, August). Media frames: Approaches to conceptualization and Measurement. Paper presented at the annual convention of the association for education in Journalism and Mass Communication.
  • Wulfemeyer, K. T. (1983). Broadcast news writing. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press
  • Berlo, D. K. Lemert, J. B., & Mertz, R. J. (1969). Dimension for evaluating the acceptability of message sources. Public Opinion Quarterly, 46, 563-76.
  • Blumler, J. G., & Katz, E. (1974). The Uses of Mass Communications: Current Perspectives on Gratifications Research. Sage Annual Reviews of Communication Research Volume III.
  • Blumler, J. G., & McQuail, D. (1969). Television in politics: Its uses and influence. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Fogg, B. J. (2003). Prominence-interpretation theory: Explaining how people assess credibility online.
  • Hachten, W. A. (1998). The troubles of journalism. New Jersey: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates Inc.
  • Hartley, J. (1982). Understanding news. New York: Routledge.
  • Katz, E., Blumler, J. G., & Gurevitch, M. (1973). Uses and gratifications research. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 37(4), 509-523.
  • Mc Crosky, J.C. (1998). An introduction to communication in the classroom (2nd ed), MA; Tapestry Press.
  • Mclntyre, D. A. (2012). America's 10 largest websites.Sept. 10, 2012 http:/bottomline.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/03/25/10760486-americas-10-largest- websites.
  • McQuail, d. (2005). Mass communication theory. Oxford: The Alden Press
  • Metzgar, E., & Maruggi, A. (2010). Social media and the 2008 presidential election. Journal of new Communication Research
  • Metzger, M. J. Flanagin, A., Eyal, K., Lemus D. R., & McCann, R. M. (2003) Credibility for 21st. CHI'03 Extended abstracts on human factors in computing system, 722-723
  • Nielsen. (2009). Global Faces Networked Places. Nielsen online: The Nielsen Company.
  • Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuation. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 123-205.
  • Tankard, J., Hendrickson,L., Silberman,J., Bliss, K., & Ghanem, S.(1991, August). Media frames: Approaches to conceptualization and Measurement. Paper presented at the annual convention of the association for education in Journalism and Mass Communication.
  • Wulfemeyer, K. T. (1983). Broadcast news writing. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press

Cite this article

    APA : Shahid, M., Ali, K., & Kamal, M. (2019). How much Users Consider Information from Social Media Reliable: A Study regarding Facebook, Twitter and WhatsApp. Global Mass Communication Review, IV(I), 52-74. https://doi.org/10.31703/gmcr.2019(IV-I).05
    CHICAGO : Shahid, Muhammad, Kainat Ali, and Musa Kamal. 2019. "How much Users Consider Information from Social Media Reliable: A Study regarding Facebook, Twitter and WhatsApp." Global Mass Communication Review, IV (I): 52-74 doi: 10.31703/gmcr.2019(IV-I).05
    HARVARD : SHAHID, M., ALI, K. & KAMAL, M. 2019. How much Users Consider Information from Social Media Reliable: A Study regarding Facebook, Twitter and WhatsApp. Global Mass Communication Review, IV, 52-74.
    MHRA : Shahid, Muhammad, Kainat Ali, and Musa Kamal. 2019. "How much Users Consider Information from Social Media Reliable: A Study regarding Facebook, Twitter and WhatsApp." Global Mass Communication Review, IV: 52-74
    MLA : Shahid, Muhammad, Kainat Ali, and Musa Kamal. "How much Users Consider Information from Social Media Reliable: A Study regarding Facebook, Twitter and WhatsApp." Global Mass Communication Review, IV.I (2019): 52-74 Print.
    OXFORD : Shahid, Muhammad, Ali, Kainat, and Kamal, Musa (2019), "How much Users Consider Information from Social Media Reliable: A Study regarding Facebook, Twitter and WhatsApp", Global Mass Communication Review, IV (I), 52-74
    TURABIAN : Shahid, Muhammad, Kainat Ali, and Musa Kamal. "How much Users Consider Information from Social Media Reliable: A Study regarding Facebook, Twitter and WhatsApp." Global Mass Communication Review IV, no. I (2019): 52-74. https://doi.org/10.31703/gmcr.2019(IV-I).05