ARTICLE

MODERATION OF SUPERIOR SUBORDINATE COMMUNICATION RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN POLICY MAKING AND POLICY BASED ATTITUDE TOWARDS IMPLEMENTATION

02 Pages : 15-29

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/gmcr.2020(V-I).02      10.31703/gmcr.2020(V-I).02      Published : Mar 2020

Moderation of Superior-Subordinate Communication: Relationship between Policy-Making and Policy based Attitude towards Implementation

    The study bridges the research gap concerning the direct relation of policymaking (PM) and policy-based attitude (PBA), later by investigating the moderation of superior-subordinate communication (SSC) in their relationship by advancing the LMX theory. Using the demonstrative sample (n=253) collected from the in-service bureaucrats of Punjab, data were analyzed by using (SEM) Structural Equation Modeling approach on AMOS 22.0. The findings demonstrate that a positive relationship existed between policymaking and policy-based attitude. Meanwhile, SSC moderates the policymaking and policy-based attitude positively. It also suggests some recommendations for improving the policymaking by ensuring the availability of SSC channels among the bureaucracy of Punjab.

    Superior-Subordinate Communication, Policymaking, Policy-Based Attitude, Pakistan. Bureaucracy of Punjab.
    (1) Syed Hassan Raza
    Lecturer, Department of Communication Studies, Bahauddin Zakariya University Multan, Punjab, Pakistan.
    (2) Tahir Mahmood
    Assistant Professor, Department of Communication Studies, Bahauddin Zakariya University Multan, Punjab, Pakistan.
    (3) Moneeba Iftikhar
    Lecturer, Department of Mass Communication, Lahore College for Women University, Lahore, Pakistan.
  • Abu Bakar, H., & McCann, R. M. (2016). An Examination of Leader-Member Dyadic Politeness of Exchange and Servant Leadership on Group Member Performance. International Journal of Business Communication, 1-25. DOI: 10.1177/23294884155975
  • Bakar, H. A., Mohamad, B., & Mustafa, C. S. (2007). Superior-Subordinate Communication Dimensions and Working Relationship: Gender Preferences in a Malaysian Organization. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 36(1), 51-69.
  • Bartlett, J. E., Kotrlik, J. W. K. J. W., & Higgins, C. (2001). Organizational research: Determining appropriate sample size in survey research appropriate sample size in survey research. Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal, 19(1), 43.
  • Bisel, R. S., & Kramer, M. W. (2014). Denying what workers believe are unethical workplace requests: Do workers use moral, operational, or policy justifications publicly? Management Communication Quarterly, 28(1), 111-129.
  • Cairney, P. (2013). Understanding public policy : theories and issues. Public Administration, 91(3), 782-793.
  • Considine, M. (2012). Thinking Outside the Box? Applying Design Theory to Public Policy. Politics & Policy, 40(4), 704-724.
  • Dieleman, M., Shaw, D. M., & Zwanikken, P. (2011). Improving the implementation of health workforce policies through governance: a review of case studies. Human Resources for Health, 9(1), 10. DOI: 10.1186/1478-4491-9-10
  • Evans, B., & Wellstead, A. (2013). Policy dialogue and engagement between non-governmental organizations and government: A survey of processes and instruments of canadian policy workers. Central European Journal of Public Policy, 7(1), 60-87.
  • Farr, J., Hacker, J. S., & Kazee, N. (2006). The Policy Scientist of Democracy: The Discipline of Harold D. Lasswell. American Political Science Review, 100(4), 579-588.
  • Farr, J., Hacker, J. S., & Kazee, N. (2008). Revisiting Lasswell. Policy Sciences, 41(1), 21-32.
  • Fischer, F., Miller, G. J., & Sidney, M. S. (2007). Handbook of public policy analysis : theory, politics, and methods. Methods, 125, 642
  • Fulton, B. (2004). Communication Researchers and Policy-Making. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 48(1), 151-154.
  • Hallsworth, M. (2011). Policymaking in the Real World. Political Insight, 2(1), 10-12.
  • Hasnain, A., Raza, S. H., & Qureshi, U. S. (2020). The Impact of Personal and Cultural Factors on Green Buying Intentions with Mediating Roles of Environmental Attitude and Eco- Labels as Well as Gender as a Moderator. South Asian Journal of Management, 14(1), 1-27.
  • Hayes, A. F., Montoya, A. K., & Rockwood, N. J. (2017). The analysis of mechanisms and their contingencies: PROCESS versus structural equation modeling. Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ), 25(1), 76-81.
  • Howlett, M., Tan, S. L., Migone, A., Wellstead, A., & Evans, B. (2014). The distribution of analytical techniques in policy advisory systems: Policy formulation and the tools of policy appraisal. Public Policy and Administration, 29(4), 271-291.
  • John, P., & Cole, A. (2000). When Do Institutions, Policy Sectors, and Cities Matter?: Comparing Networks of Local Policy Makers in Britain and France. Comparative Political Studies, 33(2), 248-268.
  • Knill, C., & Bauer, M. W. (2016). Policymaking by international public administrations: concepts, causes and consequences. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(7), 949-959
  • Lamude, K. G., Scudder, J., Simmons, D., & Torres, P. (2004). Organizational Newcomers: Temporary and Regular Employees, Same-Sex and Mixed-Sex Superior-Subordinate Dyads, Supervisor Influence Techniques, Subordinates Communication Satisfaction, and Leader-Member Exchange. Communication Research Reports, 24(1), 60-67.
  • May, P. J., & Jochim, A. E. (2013). Policy regime perspectives: Policies, politics, and governing. Policy Studies Journal, 41(3), 426-452.
  • Mayer, I. S., van Daalen, C. E., & Bots, P. W. G. (2004). Perspectives on policy analysis: a framework for understanding and design. International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management, 4(2), 169-191.
  • c, E. E. W., Patrick, S., & King, W. (1996). Job level as a systemic variable in predicting the relationship between supervisory communication and job satisfaction. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 69, 277-293.
  • Mytelka, L. K., & Smith, K. (2002). Policy learning and innovation theory: an interactive and co- evolving process. Research Policy, 31(8-9), 1467-1479.
  • Parsons, W. (2002). From Muddling Through to Muddling Up - Evidence Based Policy Making and the Modernisation of British Government. Public Policy and Administration, 17(3), 43-60.
  • Pelletier, D. L., Frongillo, E. A., Gervais, S., Hoey, L., Menon, P., Ngo, T., ... Ahmed, T. (2012). Nutrition agenda setting, policy formulation and implementation: Lessons from the Mainstreaming Nutrition Initiative. Health Policy and Planning, 27(1), 19-31.
  • Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate behavioral research, 42(1), 185-227.
  • Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (Vol. 1). Sage.
  • Raza, S. H., Bakar, H. A., & Mohamad, B. (2019). The effects of advertising appeals on consumers' behavioural intention towards global brands. Journal of Islamic Marketing. Vol. 11 No. 2, pp. 440-460.
  • c, S. H., Bakar, H. A., & Mohamad, B. (2018). Advertising appeals and Malaysian culture norms: Scale content validation. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 28(1), 61-82.
  • Remland, M. S. (1984). Leadership impressions and nonverbal communication in a superior- subordinate interaction. Communication Quarterly, 32(1), 41-48.
  • Steele, G. A., & Plenty, D. (2015). Supervisor-Subordinate Communication Competence and Job and Communication Satisfaction. Journal of Business Communication, 52(3), 294-318.
  • Stoker, G. (1998). Governance as theory: five propositions. International Social Science Journal,50(155), 17-28.
  • Strehlenert, H., Richter-Sundberg, L., Nyström, M. E., & Hasson, H. (2015). Evidence-informed policy formulation and implementation: a comparative case study of two national policies for improving health and social care in Sweden. Implementation Science, 10(1), 169.
  • Tambulasi, R. I. C. (2011). Local Government Without Governance: A New Institutional Perspective of Local Governance Policy Paralysis in Malawi. Public Policy and Administration, 26(3), 333-352.
  • Tanner, G., & Otto, K. (2016). Superior-subordinate communication during organizational change: under which conditions does high-quality communication become important?. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27(19), 2183-2201.
  • Tuu, H. H., Olsen, S. O., Thao, D. T., & Anh, N. T. K. (2008). The role of norms in explaining attitudes, intention and consumption of a common food (fish) in Vietnam. Appetite, 51(3), 546-551.
  • Wellstead, A. M., Stedman, R. C., & Howlett, M. (2011). Policy Analytical Capacity in Changing Dovernance Contexts: A Structural Equation Model (sem) Study of Contemporary Canadian Policy Work. Public Policy and Administration, 26(3), 353-373.

Cite this article

    APA : Raza, S. H., Mahmood, T., & Iftikhar, M. (2020). Moderation of Superior-Subordinate Communication: Relationship between Policy-Making and Policy based Attitude towards Implementation. Global Mass Communication Review, V(I), 15-29. https://doi.org/10.31703/gmcr.2020(V-I).02
    CHICAGO : Raza, Syed Hassan, Tahir Mahmood, and Moneeba Iftikhar. 2020. "Moderation of Superior-Subordinate Communication: Relationship between Policy-Making and Policy based Attitude towards Implementation." Global Mass Communication Review, V (I): 15-29 doi: 10.31703/gmcr.2020(V-I).02
    HARVARD : RAZA, S. H., MAHMOOD, T. & IFTIKHAR, M. 2020. Moderation of Superior-Subordinate Communication: Relationship between Policy-Making and Policy based Attitude towards Implementation. Global Mass Communication Review, V, 15-29.
    MHRA : Raza, Syed Hassan, Tahir Mahmood, and Moneeba Iftikhar. 2020. "Moderation of Superior-Subordinate Communication: Relationship between Policy-Making and Policy based Attitude towards Implementation." Global Mass Communication Review, V: 15-29
    MLA : Raza, Syed Hassan, Tahir Mahmood, and Moneeba Iftikhar. "Moderation of Superior-Subordinate Communication: Relationship between Policy-Making and Policy based Attitude towards Implementation." Global Mass Communication Review, V.I (2020): 15-29 Print.
    OXFORD : Raza, Syed Hassan, Mahmood, Tahir, and Iftikhar, Moneeba (2020), "Moderation of Superior-Subordinate Communication: Relationship between Policy-Making and Policy based Attitude towards Implementation", Global Mass Communication Review, V (I), 15-29
    TURABIAN : Raza, Syed Hassan, Tahir Mahmood, and Moneeba Iftikhar. "Moderation of Superior-Subordinate Communication: Relationship between Policy-Making and Policy based Attitude towards Implementation." Global Mass Communication Review V, no. I (2020): 15-29. https://doi.org/10.31703/gmcr.2020(V-I).02