Printed Versus Electronic Books: Uses and Preference of Mass Media Students in Lahore
This study is an exertion to determine the preference of university students regarding the usage of electronic books. Postulates of displacement theory were applied to find out the reasons behind students' adoption of online mode of reading and its effects on learning outcome. The study has examined that if the printed books will be totally replaced by the electronic version or not. A sample of 150 university students studying in the Mass Communication department was selected. Survey methodology was employed to find answers to the research questions. The findings of the study revealed that students preferred using electronic books to printed books. The e-books are considered cost-friendly, easy to access and portable. With the help of findings, it was concluded that e-books had become part and parcel of the life of students, but at the same time, there would be a preference for reading printed books.
-
Printed Books, E-books, Reading, Students
-
(1) Shazia Ismail Toor
Assistant Professor, Institute of Communication Studies, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.
(2) Ayesha Ashfaq
Associate Professor, Institute of Communication Studies, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.
(3) Muqaddas Ilyas
Institute of Communication Studies, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.
- Abdullah, N., & Gibb, F. (2008). Students' attitudes towards e-books in a Scottish higher education institute: Part 1. Library Review, 57(8), 593-605
- Bodomo, A., Lam, M., & Lee, C. (2003). Some students still read books in 21st century: A study of user preferences for print and electronic libraries. The reading matrix,34-49
- Chen, P. S. D., Lambert, A. D., & Guidry, K. R. (2010). Engaging online learners: The impact of Web-based learning technology on college student engagement. Computers & Education, 54(4), 1222-1232.
- Foasberg, N. M. (2011). Adoption of E-Book Readers among College Students: A Survey. Information Technology and Libraries, 108-128.
- Gomez, J. (2008). Print is dead. New York: St. Martin's Press.
- Hom, M. (2016). Why Human Prefer Print Books. July 19, 2017, http://scitechconnect.elsevier.com/why-humans-prefer-print-books/
- Jantz, R. (2001). E-books and new library service models: An analysis of the impact of E-Book technology on academic libraries. Information Technology and Libraries, 20, 104-115
- Kraft, A. (2015). Books vs. e-books: The science behind best way to read. June 11, 2017, http://www.cbsnews.com/news/kindle-nook-e-reader-books-thebest-way-to-read
- Liu, Z. (2005). Reading behavior in the digital environment. Journal of Documentation,61(6), 700- 712.
- Martin, K., & Quan-Haase, A. (2013). Are e-books replacing print books? Tradition, serendipity, and opportunity in the adoption and use of e-books for historical research and teaching. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(5), 1016-1028
- Miller, J. R., Nutting, A. W., & Baker-Eveleth, L. (2013). The Determinants of Electronic Textbook Use Among College Students. The American Economist, 58(1), 41-50.
- McMaken, L. (2012). E-Books VS Print Books. June 14, 2017, http://www.investopedia.com/financial-edge/0812/e-books-vs.-print-books.aspx
- Newman, W. L. (2014). Social Research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. USA: Pearson Education Limited.
- Robinson, J. P., & Martin, S. (2009). IT and activity displacement: Behavioral evidence from the US General Social Survey (GSS). Social Indicators Research, 91(2), 115- 139.
- Rockinson-Szapkiw, A. J., Courduff, J., Carter, K., & Bennett, D. (2013). Electronic versus traditional print textbooks: A comparison study on the influence of university students' learning. Computers & Education, 63, 259-266.
- Sun, J., Flores, J., & Tanguma, J. (2012). E-textbooks and student's Learning Experiences. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 10(1), 63-77.
- Tanner, M. J. (2014). Digital vs. print: Reading comprehension and the future of the book. SLIS Student Research Journal, 4(2).
- Zucker, T. A., Moody, A. K., & McKenna, M. C. (2009). The Effects of Electronic Books on Pre- Kindergarten-to-Grade 5 Students' Literacy and Language Outcomes: A Research Synthesis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 40(1), 47-87.
Cite this article
-
APA : Toor, S. I., Ashfaq, A., & Ilyas, M. (2021). Printed Versus Electronic Books: Uses and Preference of Mass Media Students in Lahore. Global Mass Communication Review, VI(I), 70-78. https://doi.org/10.31703/gmcr.2021(VI-I).06
-
CHICAGO : Toor, Shazia Ismail, Ayesha Ashfaq, and Muqaddas Ilyas. 2021. "Printed Versus Electronic Books: Uses and Preference of Mass Media Students in Lahore." Global Mass Communication Review, VI (I): 70-78 doi: 10.31703/gmcr.2021(VI-I).06
-
HARVARD : TOOR, S. I., ASHFAQ, A. & ILYAS, M. 2021. Printed Versus Electronic Books: Uses and Preference of Mass Media Students in Lahore. Global Mass Communication Review, VI, 70-78.
-
MHRA : Toor, Shazia Ismail, Ayesha Ashfaq, and Muqaddas Ilyas. 2021. "Printed Versus Electronic Books: Uses and Preference of Mass Media Students in Lahore." Global Mass Communication Review, VI: 70-78
-
MLA : Toor, Shazia Ismail, Ayesha Ashfaq, and Muqaddas Ilyas. "Printed Versus Electronic Books: Uses and Preference of Mass Media Students in Lahore." Global Mass Communication Review, VI.I (2021): 70-78 Print.
-
OXFORD : Toor, Shazia Ismail, Ashfaq, Ayesha, and Ilyas, Muqaddas (2021), "Printed Versus Electronic Books: Uses and Preference of Mass Media Students in Lahore", Global Mass Communication Review, VI (I), 70-78
-
TURABIAN : Toor, Shazia Ismail, Ayesha Ashfaq, and Muqaddas Ilyas. "Printed Versus Electronic Books: Uses and Preference of Mass Media Students in Lahore." Global Mass Communication Review VI, no. I (2021): 70-78. https://doi.org/10.31703/gmcr.2021(VI-I).06