ARTICLE

THEMATIC ANALYSIS OF THE EDITORIALS OF PAKISTANI PRINT MEDIA DURING THE GENERAL ELECTION 2018

16 Pages : 187 - 201

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/gmcr.2020(V-III).16      10.31703/gmcr.2020(V-III).16      Published : Sep 2020

Thematic Analysis of the Editorials of Pakistani Print Media during the General Election, 2018

    Print media has been a major source of information for people across the globe. It has played a vital role in every field of life by highlighting issues and promoting positive images. Likewise, its role in the elections cannot be ignored. The current study investigates the topic of discussion in the editorials. Public issues were discussed, the frequency of supported political parties and the differences in the editorials among the newspapers during the general election 2018. The data analysis revealed marginalized importance of public issues for the editorial writers. The analysis also indicated a strong heedlessness towards public issues and welfare. Thus, it is concluded that both priming and framing of international issues are overemphasizes the financial situation. Theeditorials have been found focused on Pakistan Tehreek-Insaf and Pakistan Muslim League (N) while, public issues such as poverty, childlabour, education, and others remained highly underrepresented

    Media Framing; Political Communication, Election Campaigns, Print Media, Newspapers
    (1) Riaz Ahmad
    PhD Scholar of Information and Communication Sciences, Université de Lille, France.
    (2) Bin Yamin Khan
    Lecture at Department of Communication and Media Studies, Hazara University Mansehra, KP, Pakistan.
    (3) Widad Mustafa El Hadi
    Professor of Information and Communication Sciences, Université de Lille, France.
  • Adnan, M., & Fatima, B. (2018). Political, Economic and Social Governance in Pakistan: Its Practices and Issues. Journal of the Research Society of Pakistan, 55(1), 157-171.
  • Berinsky, A. J., & Kinder, D. R. (2006). Making Sense of Issues Through Media Frames: Understanding the Kosovo Crisis. The Journal of Politics, 68(3), 640–656. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00451.x
  • Blumler, J. G. (1979). The Role of Theory in Uses and Gratifications Studies. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/009365027900600102
  • Carroll, C. E., & McCombs, M. (2003). Agenda-setting Effects of Business News on the Public’s Images and Opinions about Major Corporations. Corporate Reputation Review, 6(1), 36–46. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.crr.1540188
  • Ceron, A., & Memoli, V. (2015). Trust in Government and Media Slant. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 20(3), 339–359. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161215572634
  • Daniel, E. (2016). The Usefulness of Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches and Methods in Researching Problem-Solving Ability in Science Education Curriculum. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(5), 91-100.
  • Drid, T. (2010). Discourse Analysis: Key concepts and perspectives. University of Ouargla, 20-25. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282184078_DISCOURSE_ANALYSIS_KEY_CONCEPTS_AND_PERSPECTIVES
  • Druckman, J. N., & Parkin, M. (2005). The Impact of Media Bias: How Editorial Slant Affects Voters. The Journal of Politics, 67(4), 1030–1049. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2005.00349.x
  • Ergün, E., & Karsten, N. (2019). Media logic in the coverage of election promises: comparative evidence from the Netherlands and the US. Acta Politica, 56(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41269-019-00141-8
  • Fortunato, & Martin. (2016). The Intersection of Agenda-Setting, the Media Environment, and Election Campaign Laws. Journal of Information Policy, 6, 129. https://doi.org/10.5325/jinfopoli.6.2016.0129
  • Gérard, L. (1969). Blumler J. G., McQuail D., Television and politics: Its uses and influence. - Persée. https://www.persee.fr/doc/rfsoc_0035-2969_1969_num_10_1_1489
  • Gerber, A., Karlan, D., & Bergan, D. (2009). Does the media matter? A field experiment measuring the effect of newspapers on voting Behavior and Political Opinions. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 1(2), 35-52.
  • Gurevitch, M., Coleman, S., & Blumler, J. G. (2009). Political Communication—Old and New Media Relationships. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 625(1), 164–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716209339345
  • Hänggli, R., & Kriesi, H. (2010). Political Framing Strategies and Their Impact on Media Framing in a Swiss Direct-Democratic Campaign. Political Communication, 27(2), 141–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600903501484
  • Harlan, W. H. (1970). Review of Television in Politics: Its Uses and Influence. Review of Review of Television in Politics: Its Uses and Influence., by J. G. Blumler & D. McQuail. American Sociological Review, 35(2), 388–389. https://doi.org/10.2307/2093265
  • Iyengar, S., & Hahn, K. S. (2009). Red Media, Blue Media: Evidence of Ideological Selectivity in Media Use. Journal of Communication, 59(1), 19–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01402.x
  • Karamat, K., & Saleem, N. (2020). An Analysis of National Political Conflicts in Leading Urdu Pakistani Newspapers during 2015-17. https://www.gprjournal.com/jadmin/Auther/31rvIolA2LALJouq9hkR/sVajMFf5pE.pdf
  • Livingstone, S., & Lunt, P. (2013). The mass media, democracy and the public sphere.
  • Mcleod, J. M., Scheufele, D. A., & Moy, P. (1999). Community, Communication, and Participation: The Role of Mass Media and Interpersonal Discussion in Local Political Participation. Political Communication, 16(3), 315–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/105846099198659
  • Morrison, K. (2018). Change, Continuity and Crisis. Montenegro’s Political Trajectory (1988-2016). Südosteuropa, 66(2), 153–181. https://doi.org/10.1515/soeu-2018-0014
  • Nebojsa Vladisavljevic, & Voltmer, K. (2017). Media framing of democratization conflicts in Egypt, Kenya, Serbia and South Africa: A content analysis. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.28403.53281
  • O’Malley, E., Brandenburg, H., Flynn, R., McMenamin, I., & Rafter, K. (2012). Explaining Media Framing of Election Coverage: Bringing in the Political Context. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2189468
  • Peters, E., Hess, T. M., Västfjäll, D., & Auman, C. (2007). Adult Age Differences in Dual Information Processes: Implications for the Role of Affective and Deliberative Processes in Older Adults’ Decision Making. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00025.x
  • Rahman, M. S. (2016). The Advantages and Disadvantages of Using Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches and Methods in Language “Testing and Assessment” Research: A Literature Review. Journal of Education and Learning, 6(1), 102. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v6n1p102
  • Rexha, G. (2014). The role of media in political communication: the case of Kosovo. 2014 UBT International Conference. https://doi.org/10.33107/ubt-ic.2014.30
  • Schmitt-Beck, R. (2003). Mass Communication, Personal Communication and Vote Choice: The Filter Hypothesis of Media Influence in Comparative Perspective. British Journal of Political Science, 33(02). https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007123403000103
  • Schudson, M. (2002). The news media as political institutions. In Annual Review of Political Science. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.5.111201.115816
  • Shu, K., Sliva, A., Wang, S., Tang, J., & Liu, H. (2017). Fake News Detection on Social Media. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter, 19(1), 22–36. https://doi.org/10.1145/3137597.3137600
  • Silverblatt, A. (2004). Media as Social Institution. American Behavioral Scientist, 48(1), 35–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764204267249
  • Soroka, S. N. (2002). Issue Attributes and Agenda-Setting by Media, the Public, and Policymakers in Canada. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 14(3), 264–285. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/14.3.264
  • Van der Pas, D. J., & Aaldering, L. (2020). Gender Differences in Political Media Coverage: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Communication, 70(1), 114–143. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqz046
  • van Praag, P., & van der Eijk, C. (1998). News Content and Effects in an Historic Campaign. Political Communication, 15(2), 165–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609809342364
  • Wettstein, M., & Wirth, W. (2017). Media Effects: How Media Influence Voters. Swiss Political Science Review, 23(3), 262–269. https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12263
  • Wolton, S. (2019). Are Biased Media Bad for Democracy? American Journal of Political Science, 63(3), 548–562. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12424

Cite this article

    APA : Ahmad, R., Khan, B. Y., & Hadi, W. M. E. (2020). Thematic Analysis of the Editorials of Pakistani Print Media during the General Election, 2018. Global Mass Communication Review, V(III), 187 - 201. https://doi.org/10.31703/gmcr.2020(V-III).16
    CHICAGO : Ahmad, Riaz, Bin Yamin Khan, and Widad Mustafa El Hadi. 2020. "Thematic Analysis of the Editorials of Pakistani Print Media during the General Election, 2018." Global Mass Communication Review, V (III): 187 - 201 doi: 10.31703/gmcr.2020(V-III).16
    HARVARD : AHMAD, R., KHAN, B. Y. & HADI, W. M. E. 2020. Thematic Analysis of the Editorials of Pakistani Print Media during the General Election, 2018. Global Mass Communication Review, V, 187 - 201.
    MHRA : Ahmad, Riaz, Bin Yamin Khan, and Widad Mustafa El Hadi. 2020. "Thematic Analysis of the Editorials of Pakistani Print Media during the General Election, 2018." Global Mass Communication Review, V: 187 - 201
    MLA : Ahmad, Riaz, Bin Yamin Khan, and Widad Mustafa El Hadi. "Thematic Analysis of the Editorials of Pakistani Print Media during the General Election, 2018." Global Mass Communication Review, V.III (2020): 187 - 201 Print.
    OXFORD : Ahmad, Riaz, Khan, Bin Yamin, and Hadi, Widad Mustafa El (2020), "Thematic Analysis of the Editorials of Pakistani Print Media during the General Election, 2018", Global Mass Communication Review, V (III), 187 - 201
    TURABIAN : Ahmad, Riaz, Bin Yamin Khan, and Widad Mustafa El Hadi. "Thematic Analysis of the Editorials of Pakistani Print Media during the General Election, 2018." Global Mass Communication Review V, no. III (2020): 187 - 201. https://doi.org/10.31703/gmcr.2020(V-III).16